Perhaps many of you have heard the quote attributed to
Martin Niemoller which begins
“First they came for the Socialists and I did not speak out—because I was not a
Socialist….” There are several
versions of this quote but they all end with something like: “Then they came
for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”
I was thinking about this quote and began to wonder what it
would sound like if written from the perspective of Christian churches in North
America. Pondering this it dawned on me: when we speak of the decline of the
Christian church in North America we are probably generally thinking about the
white Christian church in North America.
I also realized my perspective is even narrower since I only have experience with white, Christian, mid-western North America, churches. So, bear this perspective in mind when
you read the following. I also
wanted to emphatically point out I could not say “they came for” because no one
is coming for the Christian church.
Talk of war on Christianity in North America seems to me to be the
privileged attempting to justify their own fear. So, instead I will talk about why people leave. Here is where my imagination took me:
The Door of the Christian Church
First to slip out the door were those too overwhelmed with the
daily grind of poverty. From work
schedules to clothing to exhaustion, none of it fit with “how we have always
done” church. So they slipped
away and became projects for the church. No one noticed since the
offering remained relatively undisturbed.
Then, those whose lives had been claimed as property were
shoved off to another door. Even
after slavery had ended and a passing phrase or two in scripture no longer
smoothed ruffled consciences still our monochromatic Sunday morning color
scheme soothed our senses and fed our ignorance. So we didn’t worry about it.
Then, those of differing nations of origin, were stopped at
the door with a sign, which shouted ENGLISH. Blinded to our own history by fear for our jobs, we talked
about legalities, ignored our complicity, and shuffled them off to be “with
their own kind.”
Then, the door was slammed in the faces of those whose
sexual orientation, or lifestyle choices didn’t meet with approval. We professed our love for them, just
not their sin. We did so quickly,
just before the door slammed.
Then went the heretics, the intellectuals, the partiers, the adventurers,
the socialists, the feminists, the loners, the liberals, the doubters, the
wonderers, the wanderers, the tree huggers, the philosophers. Many drifted out the door with phrases like
“scripture clearly states,” “ we’re not social workers, we have to share the
Good News,” and “why don’t you come to worship?” nipping at their heels.
Until at last the church was such an empty place we wrapped
everyone else up in a label, which read “those without right priorities” and
let them fade on out the door.
No one was left to hear us whisper, “I told you so. See how those people killed our
church.” As the door slid shut for
good.
Certainly not as succinct and profound as Martin Niemoller but hopefully you get the idea. The weird thing is the only way to prevent the ending to this story is to quit trying. Stop trying to save the
church and start living love instead.
2 comments:
I often wonder what people think of Andover Lutheran, but it's a moot point. The real question is, "What does the Lord God think of Andover Lutheran?" What Jesus thought of the seven churches, found in Revelation 2 and 3 is revealing. Jesus talks in all seven revelations about overcoming, leaving us to hope there is always hope. But his last words to his disciples (who were to carry on his revelations to the entire world) his last words were to love one another. You can find this in John 15. This is how we are to be identified as his disciples. This is how we are identified as God's children. The church can only offer hope with love. This is the only way to overcome.
In God's name, for what other reason does the church exist?!
Thanks, Wanda, for your thoughts. I agree love is central. The tricky part is the church (the church in general not any specific church) has often seemed to translate loving others something more like "love them for the potential they have to become like us, believe like us, behave like we think they should." We often forget we have much to learn from others, from their journeys, from their wisdom. How do we love people for who they are rather than for their potential for conversion and if we did that, how would it change how we do church? Thanks for helping me to think about this further!
Post a Comment