Welcome!

A former Lutheran pastor sharing thoughts on faith and life. Please join the conversation! I love your comments!

Thursday, July 3, 2014

The Supreme Court Decision and What My Faith Is Not

I am very disturbed by the Supreme Court decision regarding the Hobby Lobby case.  Others have spoken more knowledgeably and eloquently on this topic than I could.  Instead I would like to address what this case has to do with faith.  I feel compelled, more specifically, to state what this case does NOT have to do with my faith.

My faith is not about believing my religious freedom is infringed upon if I am prevented from forcing others to live according to my beliefs. 

Nor does my faith mean choosing when to believe science, relying on science for everything from transportation to health care but ignoring science whenever the results of scientific studies are politically or religiously inconvenient.

My faith has nothing to do with siding with the powerful.  Again.  And again.  And again.

Claiming I am a follower of Jesus does not mean believing a company, a politician, or any public figure is beyond criticism as long as they claim to be a born again Christian and are against abortion and homosexuality.

I am all for standing up for one’s beliefs….which does not look anything like judging others, demanding preferential treatment, or blindly praising anyone who claims his/her actions as Christian

There is an aspect of my faith which is not purely logical because faith speaks to things which are beyond words, much like poetry and art.  This does not give me license to ignore logic to the detriment of others.   If your faith calls you to try walking on water, go for it.  But using faith as an excuse to throw someone else into the stormy sea is not okay. 

Therefore, “I believe” is not an adequate rationale for public policy.

Yet again, this week, news events painted a picture of Christianity which I fine infuriating.  This picture is far from what my faith looks like to me.  I hope it is an inaccurate picture for many but when this type of thing keeps happening and I hear people celebrating such decisions my hope wanes.  Judgmental, pushy, seeking preferential treatment, ignorant of science…none of these seem like the descriptors for which people of faith should be striving.  Not a great image for evangelism (if I believed in evangelism) nor a great way to love our neighbors. 

To my fellow Jesus followers I issue a plea to consider this simple litmus test:  if a particular stance makes life easier for those with great power and great wealth and more difficult for those with little power and little money, it likely has nothing to do with following Jesus.



Thursday, June 12, 2014

Humility and Pentecost

I have a love hate relationship with The Confession.  The time during worship when we pause to confess our sin provides a moment of reflection and centering.  Yet after conversations I have had with atheists and others who have been hurt by the church,  I can’t help but think how talk of sin can turn into devaluing of human beings.  It can turn into “you are never good enough” “you don’t deserve blessings” “you deserve God’s punishment but Jesus saved you.”  So, I always cringe a bit when we get to the confession.  But last Sunday I heard the confession differently due to what I was about to talk about in my sermon.  This time I heard the confession, simply as a call to humility.   Here is what I said in my sermon:

Today is the day of Pentecost.  One day we set aside to talk about the Holy Spirit.  We don’t talk about the Holy Spirit much.  In seminary this was true as well.  When, in our senior year, we finally had a class called The Holy Spirit and the Triune God, we still spent much of our time talking about things like the church in general.  When  a student questioned our professor on this, he said the Holy Spirit resists being spoken of.  Speaking of the Spirit is like trying to capture wind. 
My professor went on to tell us “If you wonder if you have the Holy Spirit, just breathe.”  The word used in today’s scripture (John 20:22) when Jesus breathes the Holy Spirit on the disciples is the same word used in Genesis when God breathed life into the first human.  The Spirit is the spirit of life by which we are able to draw breath.  To feel the Holy Spirit just breathe. 

Now that is not to say if you have difficulty breathing due to asthma or lung disease somehow that means you have less of the Holy Spirit or that the Holy Spirit abandons us when we cease to breathe at the moment of death.  These would be examples of why the Spirit resists being spoken of.  When we speak of the Spirit we are forced to use limited human vocabulary and limited human ideas.  Therefore we often end up saying things we do not intend and whatever we say will not be wholly accurate or adequate. 

I think in some ways we have forgotten this is true of all aspects of God, not just the Holy Spirit.  Too many people think they can define God, can define who God is and who God’s followers are.  And even when we resist this kind of arrogance we tend to be a bit casual about identifying where God is at work.  We praise God for saving us from a tornado without pausing to give thought to what such praise communicates about God’s love for those who did not survive.  We give God credit for intervening to bring a person comfort in a time of need without taking seriously questions about why God did not intervene to prevent the tragedy which brought the need for comfort in the first place. 

Though we still often refer to God as “Lord” Christians have strayed far from the idea which brought about such a habit.  The idea behind this phrasing was to replace the name of God with the word "Lord" because God’s name was considered too holy to be spoken.  In attempting to capture the intimacy of God, God’s presence in our lives and the dearness of God’s love for us, we have unintentionally come to think of God as a person so near to human as to be restricted to a particular gender and too often defined by the characteristics associated with that particular gender.  In attempting to imagine God we have created God in our own image so that God matches our own cultural idiosyncrasies. In this region of the country, there are times one would think God drove a pickup truck draped in the American flag complete with a fully loaded gun rack in the super cab. 

But it is difficult to avoid these pitfalls.  Our language and even our imaginations are so limited by our experiences.  When people try to avoid these they speak of God as “the ground of all being” or “the force of love” “the spirit of truth.”  In these images God is reduced to something with no more agency than dirt, no more intimacy than an idea, and as difficult with which to communicate as the wind.  God is mysteriously beyond us and tremendously near to us in ways words just cannot capture.

This is not to say we should cease speaking of God, but simply a call to remember the best theology we may create is both true and not true.  To remember to approach conversations about theology with humble spirits and generous hearts, leaving room for the spirit to transform our stumbling words into a language we all can hear. 
Pentecost, with its emphasis on the Holy Spirit, is a good reminder of the mysterious nature and transcendence of God. So let Pentecost serve as a call to humility  and a word of comfort.  We remember today the spirit of God which is both beyond words and so close to us as to be the very air we breathe.   Thanks be to God.  Amen.

This was my sermon last Sunday and in anticipation of these words, when I was speaking the confession I found myself wondering how the Christian church with all its talk of sin could have so entirely missed the call to humility.  How is it we have come to think we have a monopoly on truth?  How is it we have come to a level of confidence and certainty about our own beliefs we would not only stake our own salvation on it but damn our neighbors accordingly?  How is it we have become so wrapped up in our own “right” beliefs that we invest nearly all of our energy, our time, and our collective will in preaching and worship rather than the justice and mercy which would allow us to help people here and now?

It is good to have personal humility.  It is good to remember, as I say confession, I have my own failings and am of no greater value than every other human being.  It is good also to remember humility collectively as the church.  Christianity does not have a monopoly on truth, has made and continues to make mistakes.  Wouldn’t it make sense then to base our activities upon living love in ways which help others and all of creation rather than basing them on something as uncertain as our beliefs?


Thursday, May 29, 2014

Misogyny and the Complicity of the Church

I was reluctant to jump on the band wagon and talk about #yesallwomen.  However, there are a few things I feel I need to say. 

First, let’s please get over “the Santa Barbara killings aren’t really about misogyny but rather about mental illness/gun control/a madman.”  Every tragedy has multiple contributing factors.  To imply we shouldn’t talk about one of those factors because of the existence of the others is nothing more than a convenient excuse to avoid conversations.   The killer did not snatch his twisted ideas out of thin air.  The flood of stories following #yesallwomen screams there is a problem here worthy of discussion.  Indeed I have some of my own #yesallwomen stories but they pale in comparison to many of those already expressed so I will let those with deeper pain speak.  They deserve to be heard. 

Secondly, I think it high time the church recognized its own complicity in rape culture, misogyny, and violence toward women.  Christianity has a history of patriarchy and some corners of the church still demand women take a subservient position to men.  You can call it complementarianism if you want, but that doesn’t change the fact it is harmful discrimination which feeds misogyny.  

The church also has a history of things like celebrating virginity to the point of idolatry, (with a strong emphasis on female virginity) and viewing sex as sinful. None of this has much to say about consensuality. 

The church has been great over the years at things like teaching girls to dress modestly, abstinence contracts, purity balls, and coaching boys to ask for permission before kissing a girl.  But something is missing in such education when abstinence contracts have as much or more to do with a future spouse or a girl's father as with the girl herself, and asking for permission to kiss has little to do with what the girl wants to do  but more about what she will allow the boy to do.

Surely Christianity could have more to say about sexuality and women and respect than this but alas those who are not engaged in the above cringe worthy activities are conspicuously silent.  It is time to break the silence.

In “Dude, It’s You.”  John Beckett writes, “We need a culture that teaches “consensual” doesn’t just mean not forced, it means mutually desired.”

We need a church which teaches that too.  Hiding behind “if sex is only for marriage then it will be mutual,” ignores domestic violence and anything outside of actual intercourse not to mention being unrealistic.  This mutuality extends beyond sex and sexuality into all areas of a relationship.  This is about how to love one another.  The church ought to have something to say about that.

I have often told youth I would rather they cuss up a storm than tell one fat joke or gay joke because the jokes do much more harm.  Likewise it is more important to me our youth learn the importance of enthusiastic consent, safety, and valuing all people than that they learn to strive for abstinence. 

So, #yesallwomen because the church is complicit in patriarchy, misogyny, and rape culture.  Let us not remain silent.